Is it Art?

[Tư Âm Diệp Ẩn]

[TẶNG BẠN] TRỌN BỘ Bí kíp học tốt 08 môn
Chắc suất Đại học top - Giữ chỗ ngay!!

ĐĂNG BÀI NGAY để cùng trao đổi với các thành viên siêu nhiệt tình & dễ thương trên diễn đàn.

Corinne
Art is the result of an artist using her or his skill or creative imagination for a creative purpose, to give pleasure to the viewer through it's aesthetic qualities, or to get a reaction from the audience to a wider more significant issue outside the work of art itself. That work of art might be a painting, a sculpture, an installation of some kind or an example from the performing arts like dance or mime. I think we sometimes get bogged down by the notion of 'skill'. For many in the anti modern art camp, there needs to be evidence of the artist's craft on show before the work is taken seriously and can merit the term 'art', be it intricate drawing skills, expert use of form or an artist's eye for colour. I'm not suggesting that an artist need not have these credentials but hand in hand with craft is, as I said earlier, creative imagination, the ability to see the value or beauty of something unremarkable which would often go unnoticed by the untrained eye. Much of modern art I think possesses this second quality which is why I often leave an exhibition of modern art feeling that I've had the chance to reflect on something that I wouldn't normally have given the time of day to. The art has engaged me, has had an impact, made me think about something in a way that I wouldn't have thought about before.
Michael
I would certainly call myself an art enthusiast and have been for many years and in my opinion the modern art world is full of second-rate junk which most of us, if we were being totally honest, would agree a 4-year-old child could do. The idea that a slept-in bed such as that 'produced' by Tracy Emin or many of the pieces by Damien Hirst and his ilk are works of art is hard to justify as is the huge price tag that accompanies their work. I find it particularly galling when extremely talented people out there who have spent years honing their skills and learning the craft of drawing or painting are completely ignored. What's more, one of the dangers of this kind of 'art' is that it serves to alienate the mass of the population from the visual arts. The man in the street viewing one of these pieces is left thinking the world of modern art has no value; worse still, that he lacks the intellectual ability to understand the meaning of the piece when in fact there is little to interpret. Thankfully, one or two great artists make it through, but I'm afraid many are lost amongst the deluge of dross the art-world deems 'art'. For me, the first measure of the worth of an artist must be the degree of skill exhibited in the work or at the very least a pedigree of fine art preceding any more abstract pieces produced by the artist such as was the case with Picasso.
Robert
The idea that modern art is some kind of mass deception and that all modern artists are talentless fraudsters just doesn't hold water. And I'm not talking here about the painters who for centuries have to make a living out of copying works of art and selling them on as originals. I'm talking about abstract art and the idea that the great art collectors such as the Saatchis or Rockerfellas and the great museums of art around the world, would somehow allow themselves to be duped into paying a fortune for an abstract painting or sculpture. Are these artists really tricking these people into paying huge sums of money for something worthless? Of course not. Though some of these works may not appear to the layman as having any artistic merit, neither did the great impressionists or the more abstract works of Picasso or Rothko when they were first exhibited. In the same way that great poetry can speak to us in a way that prose never can, abstract art can engage with the audience in more subtle and effective ways than is the case with art of a more realistic nature. So, they may get their fingers burnt now and again but I don't think the Saatchis will be cursing the day they spent huge sums on works of abstract art. Quite the opposite in fact and in the process of making a canny investment they have helped further raise the profile of some of our great modern artists.
Janet
Here we go again: the media are once more up in arms about the latest 'is it art' shock-horror editorials following the latest Turner Prize shortlisting. When will they learn? For decades art in many forms has moved away from realism and towards abstraction. Ever since the invention and popularization of photography, art has had to reinvent itself. Patrons who wanted a perfect representation of themselves no longer needed to turn to the artist. Artists started to struggle with the challenge of catching the essence of the thing depicted rather than simply its external appearance. Abstract artists try to convey a pure idea, not the exact replica of the subject concerned. It's true that some works of art are so obscure that you may need to read up on the theory behind the creation, which is usually helpfully supplied in art galleries. But this isn't always necessary. Take Guernica by Picasso. To get a full understanding of this painting it could be argued the audience needs to appreciate the historical context, the bombing of the Basque city during the Spanish Civil War. It would also probably help to have a good understanding of the techniques of abstraction that Picasso had used to create the effect. However, I think most people viewing this masterpiece would be struck by the horror it depicts even without this background knowledge. And I would argue it is the effect of this abstraction that adds to the impact on us compared to a realistic portrayal of such a scene.


Which person gives each of these opinions about modern art?
1 Some practices have been going on for hundreds of years.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
2 Some people may not have the knowledge to understand a work of art fully.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
3 Certain aesthetic qualities can be invisible until brought to our attention by the artist.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
4 Picasso is an example of an artist who proved his craftsmanship.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
5 Appreciation of the work itself is not always the artist's aim.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
6 The purpose of Art has undergone change.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
7 People don't always appreciate the works of great artists initially.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
8 Abstract at is generally overpriced.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
9 Abstract art isn't always a good investment.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet
10 We can be touched by a work of art without knowing the context.
A) Corinne B) Michael C) Robert D) Janet

Các bạn giúp mình giải thích bài này với ạ. Cô mình cho đáp án rồi mà mình không biết đầu mà lần. Mình đúng chỉ được 1/10 thôi
Đây là key ạ: 1 C 2 D 3A 4B 5A 6D 7C 8B 9C 10D
@lebaoan.ht246@gmail.com bạn lại giúp mình với ạ

 

[ng.htrang2004]

Corinne
Art is the result of an artist using her or his skill or creative imagination for a creative purpose, to give pleasure to the viewer through it's aesthetic qualities, or to get a reaction from the audience to a wider more significant issue outside the work of art itself. [5] Artists hướng đến những cái này và không đề cập đến vấn đề appreciation. That work of art might be a painting, a sculpture, an installation of some kind or an example from the performing arts like dance or mime. I think we sometimes get bogged down by the notion of 'skill'. For many in the anti modern art camp, there needs to be evidence of the artist's craft on show before the work is taken seriously and can merit the term 'art', be it intricate drawing skills, expert use of form or an artist's eye for colour. I'm not suggesting that an artist need not have these credentials but hand in hand with craft is, as I said earlier, creative imagination, the ability to see the value or beauty of something unremarkable which would often go unnoticed by the untrained eye. [3] Untrained eye ~~ we (our), unnoticed ~ invisible ~ without any attention. [Câu này mình hiểu nhưng hơi khó giải thích á, bạn dịch 2 câu mình in nghiêng đó là hiểu sương sương nha. Much of modern art I think possesses this second quality which is why I often leave an exhibition of modern art feeling that I've had the chance to reflect on something that I wouldn't normally have given the time of day to. The art has engaged me, has had an impact, made me think about something in a way that I wouldn't have thought about before.

3 Certain aesthetic qualities can be invisible until brought to our attention by the artist.
5 Appreciation of the work itself is not always the artist's aim.



Michael
I would certainly call myself an art enthusiast and have been for many years and in my opinion the modern art world is full of second-rate junk which most of us, if we were being totally honest, would agree a 4-year-old child could do. The idea that a slept-in bed such as that 'produced' by Tracy Emin or many of the pieces by Damien Hirst and his ilk are works of art is hard to justify as is the huge price tag that accompanies their work. I find it particularly galling when extremely talented people out there who have spent years honing their skills and learning the craft of drawing or painting are completely ignored. [8] => Overpriced What's more, one of the dangers of this kind of 'art' is that it serves to alienate the mass of the population from the visual arts. The man in the street viewing one of these pieces is left thinking the world of modern art has no value; worse still, that he lacks the intellectual ability to understand the meaning of the piece when in fact there is little to interpret. Thankfully, one or two great artists make it through, but I'm afraid many are lost amongst the deluge of dross the art-world deems 'art'. For me, the first measure of the worth of an artist must be the degree of skill exhibited in the work (Mức độ kĩ năng được thể hiện) or at the very least a pedigree of fine art (Phả hệ mỹ thuật) preceding any more abstract pieces produced by the artist such as was the case with Picasso. [4] Hai cụm này tương đương với craftsmanship (sự lành nghề)

4 Picasso is an example of an artist who proved his craftsmanship.
8 Abstract art is generally overpriced.


Robert
The idea that modern art is some kind of mass deception and that all modern artists are talentless fraudsters just doesn't hold water. And I'm not talking here about the painters who for centuries ~ hundred of years [1] have to make a living out of copying works of art and selling them on as originals. I'm talking about abstract art and the idea that the great art collectors such as the Saatchis or Rockerfellas and the great museums of art around the world, would somehow allow themselves to be duped into paying a fortune for an abstract painting or sculpture. Are these artists really tricking these people into paying huge sums of money for something worthless? Of course not. Though some of these works may not appear to the layman as having any artistic merit, neither did the great impressionists or the more abstract works of Picasso or Rothko when they were first exhibited. [7] Dịch ra là hiểu nhé In the same way that great poetry can speak to us in a way that prose never can, abstract art can engage with the audience in more subtle and effective ways than is the case with art of a more realistic nature. So, they may get their fingers burnt now and again but I don't think the Saatchis will be cursing the day they spent huge sums on works of abstract art. Quite the opposite in fact and in the process of making a canny investment they have helped further raise the profile of some of our great modern artists.

1 Some practices have been going on for hundreds of years.
7 People don't always appreciate the works of great artists initially.
9 Abstract art isn't always a good investment. [Câu này mình không biết á, lúc nào cô chữa thì bạn cmt giúp mình với ha]


Janet
Here we go again: the media are once more up in arms about the latest 'is it art' shock-horror editorials following the latest Turner Prize shortlisting. When will they learn? For decades art in many forms has moved away from realism and towards abstraction. Ever since the invention and popularization of photography, art has had to reinvent itself. Patrons who wanted a perfect representation of themselves no longer needed to turn to the artist. Artists started to struggle with the challenge of catching the essence of the thing depicted rather than simply its external appearance. Abstract artists try to convey a pure idea, not the exact replica of the subject concerned. [6] Các nghệ sĩ bắt đầu phải vật lộn với thử thách nắm bắt được bản chất của sự vật được miêu tả thay vì chỉ đơn giản là hình dáng bên ngoài của nó. Các nghệ sĩ trừu tượng cố gắng truyền tải một ý tưởng thuần túy, không phải là bản sao chính xác của chủ đề liên quan. It's true that some works of art are so obscure that you may need to read up on the theory behind the creation, which is usually helpfully supplied in art galleries. But this isn't always necessary. Take Guernica by Picasso. To get a full understanding of this painting it could be argued the audience needs to appreciate the historical context, the bombing of the Basque city during the Spanish Civil War. It would also probably help to have a good understanding of the techniques of abstraction that Picasso had used to create the effect. [2] Chỗ này cũng dịch ra thôi á và suy luận thôi á, chỗ này hơi dễ bị lừa vì khúc sau. However, I think most people viewing this masterpiece would be struck by the horror it depicts even without this background knowledge [10] Hơi ngược chỗ trên một chút, nhưng mà nó là thế =))) . And I would argue it is the effect of this abstraction that adds to the impact on us compared to a realistic portrayal of such a scene.

2 Some people may not have the knowledge to understand a work of art fully.
6 The purpose of Art has undergone change.
10 We can be touched by a work of art without knowing the context.



Btw bạn thi HSG QG hay gì mà bài đọc tận CPE thế?

 

[Tư Âm Diệp Ẩn]

Corinne
Art is the result of an artist using her or his skill or creative imagination for a creative purpose, to give pleasure to the viewer through it's aesthetic qualities, or to get a reaction from the audience to a wider more significant issue outside the work of art itself. [5] Artists hướng đến những cái này và không đề cập đến vấn đề appreciation. That work of art might be a painting, a sculpture, an installation of some kind or an example from the performing arts like dance or mime. I think we sometimes get bogged down by the notion of 'skill'. For many in the anti modern art camp, there needs to be evidence of the artist's craft on show before the work is taken seriously and can merit the term 'art', be it intricate drawing skills, expert use of form or an artist's eye for colour. I'm not suggesting that an artist need not have these credentials but hand in hand with craft is, as I said earlier, creative imagination, the ability to see the value or beauty of something unremarkable which would often go unnoticed by the untrained eye. [3] Untrained eye ~~ we (our), unnoticed ~ invisible ~ without any attention. [Câu này mình hiểu nhưng hơi khó giải thích á, bạn dịch 2 câu mình in nghiêng đó là hiểu sương sương nha. Much of modern art I think possesses this second quality which is why I often leave an exhibition of modern art feeling that I've had the chance to reflect on something that I wouldn't normally have given the time of day to. The art has engaged me, has had an impact, made me think about something in a way that I wouldn't have thought about before.

3 Certain aesthetic qualities can be invisible until brought to our attention by the artist.
5 Appreciation of the work itself is not always the artist's aim.



Michael
I would certainly call myself an art enthusiast and have been for many years and in my opinion the modern art world is full of second-rate junk which most of us, if we were being totally honest, would agree a 4-year-old child could do. The idea that a slept-in bed such as that 'produced' by Tracy Emin or many of the pieces by Damien Hirst and his ilk are works of art is hard to justify as is the huge price tag that accompanies their work. I find it particularly galling when extremely talented people out there who have spent years honing their skills and learning the craft of drawing or painting are completely ignored. [8] => Overpriced What's more, one of the dangers of this kind of 'art' is that it serves to alienate the mass of the population from the visual arts. The man in the street viewing one of these pieces is left thinking the world of modern art has no value; worse still, that he lacks the intellectual ability to understand the meaning of the piece when in fact there is little to interpret. Thankfully, one or two great artists make it through, but I'm afraid many are lost amongst the deluge of dross the art-world deems 'art'. For me, the first measure of the worth of an artist must be the degree of skill exhibited in the work (Mức độ kĩ năng được thể hiện) or at the very least a pedigree of fine art (Phả hệ mỹ thuật) preceding any more abstract pieces produced by the artist such as was the case with Picasso. [4] Hai cụm này tương đương với craftsmanship (sự lành nghề)

4 Picasso is an example of an artist who proved his craftsmanship.
8 Abstract art is generally overpriced.


Robert
The idea that modern art is some kind of mass deception and that all modern artists are talentless fraudsters just doesn't hold water. And I'm not talking here about the painters who for centuries ~ hundred of years [1] have to make a living out of copying works of art and selling them on as originals. I'm talking about abstract art and the idea that the great art collectors such as the Saatchis or Rockerfellas and the great museums of art around the world, would somehow allow themselves to be duped into paying a fortune for an abstract painting or sculpture. Are these artists really tricking these people into paying huge sums of money for something worthless? Of course not. Though some of these works may not appear to the layman as having any artistic merit, neither did the great impressionists or the more abstract works of Picasso or Rothko when they were first exhibited. [7] Dịch ra là hiểu nhé In the same way that great poetry can speak to us in a way that prose never can, abstract art can engage with the audience in more subtle and effective ways than is the case with art of a more realistic nature. So, they may get their fingers burnt now and again but I don't think the Saatchis will be cursing the day they spent huge sums on works of abstract art. Quite the opposite in fact and in the process of making a canny investment they have helped further raise the profile of some of our great modern artists.

1 Some practices have been going on for hundreds of years.
7 People don't always appreciate the works of great artists initially.
9 Abstract art isn't always a good investment. [Câu này mình không biết á, lúc nào cô chữa thì bạn cmt giúp mình với ha]


Janet
Here we go again: the media are once more up in arms about the latest 'is it art' shock-horror editorials following the latest Turner Prize shortlisting. When will they learn? For decades art in many forms has moved away from realism and towards abstraction. Ever since the invention and popularization of photography, art has had to reinvent itself. Patrons who wanted a perfect representation of themselves no longer needed to turn to the artist. Artists started to struggle with the challenge of catching the essence of the thing depicted rather than simply its external appearance. Abstract artists try to convey a pure idea, not the exact replica of the subject concerned. [6] Các nghệ sĩ bắt đầu phải vật lộn với thử thách nắm bắt được bản chất của sự vật được miêu tả thay vì chỉ đơn giản là hình dáng bên ngoài của nó. Các nghệ sĩ trừu tượng cố gắng truyền tải một ý tưởng thuần túy, không phải là bản sao chính xác của chủ đề liên quan. It's true that some works of art are so obscure that you may need to read up on the theory behind the creation, which is usually helpfully supplied in art galleries. But this isn't always necessary. Take Guernica by Picasso. To get a full understanding of this painting it could be argued the audience needs to appreciate the historical context, the bombing of the Basque city during the Spanish Civil War. It would also probably help to have a good understanding of the techniques of abstraction that Picasso had used to create the effect. [2] Chỗ này cũng dịch ra thôi á và suy luận thôi á, chỗ này hơi dễ bị lừa vì khúc sau. However, I think most people viewing this masterpiece would be struck by the horror it depicts even without this background knowledge [10] Hơi ngược chỗ trên một chút, nhưng mà nó là thế =))) . And I would argue it is the effect of this abstraction that adds to the impact on us compared to a realistic portrayal of such a scene.

2 Some people may not have the knowledge to understand a work of art fully.
6 The purpose of Art has undergone change.
10 We can be touched by a work of art without knowing the context.



Btw bạn thi HSG QG hay gì mà bài đọc tận CPE thế?

không bạn ơi. Mình không đủ trình đâu. Mình chỉ luyện đề thi tỉnh do cô mình gửi thôi. Trong mấy đề hay có dạng bài kiểu tương tự thế này mà mình không biết làm. Đọc đáp án cũng không biết đúng sai thế nào.
Cảm ơn bạn đã giúp mình giải thích nha
Nhân tiện, cho mình hỏi mấy bài dạng kiểu này thì cách làm như thế nào ạ? Là tìm từ đồng nghĩa có trong bài hay là sao ạ?

 

[ng.htrang2004]

không bạn ơi. Mình không đủ trình đâu. Mình chỉ luyện đề thi tỉnh do cô mình gửi thôi. Trong mấy đề hay có dạng bài kiểu tương tự thế này mà mình không biết làm. Đọc đáp án cũng không biết đúng sai thế nào.
Cảm ơn bạn đã giúp mình giải thích nha
Nhân tiện, cho mình hỏi mấy bài dạng kiểu này thì cách làm như thế nào ạ? Là tìm từ đồng nghĩa có trong bài hay là sao ạ?

Ôi bạn ơi HSG tỉnh cùng lắm CAE là khó nhất nhất luôn rồi á, CPE thì chỉ có mấy bạn ôn HSGQG mới học thôi ~~ 2 năm học trường chuyên mình vẫn chưa được làm cái đề CPE nào trên lớp luôn ấy ~~

Đối với CAE và FCE thì đọc qua hiểu và nắm bắt chi tiết là okie, còn CPE thì đọc, dịch, hiểu, suy luận, đấu tranh tư tưởng bùng nổ cả não ra ấy. Mình làm FCE với CAE là nhiều nên mình nói qua cách làm nhé của FCE và CAE nhé:
+ Đọc qua tất cả câu hỏi, gạch keyword (như mình làm chỗ câu 1)
+ Đọc đoạn 1 => Gạch một số keyword chính trong từng câu => Đọc câu hỏi thấy cái nào đúng thì chọn luôn
+ Đọc đoạn 2 => Như trên
+ 3
+ 4
+ 5 (Nếu có)
Dạng bài này trong đề thi tỉnh mình thấy khá dễ, không quái thai như bài trên, nên cố gắng ăn điểm tối đa bài này nhé. Thời gian cho bài này nên khoảng 13 - 17p. Do đó để đảm bảo thời gian thì bạn làm thoải mái nhẹ nhàng thôi, nếu sau đó vẫn còn mấy cái features thì bạn scan thêm một tí là sẽ xong nhé.

 

[Tư Âm Diệp Ẩn]

Corinne
Art is the result of an artist using her or his skill or creative imagination for a creative purpose, to give pleasure to the viewer through it's aesthetic qualities, or to get a reaction from the audience to a wider more significant issue outside the work of art itself. [5] Artists hướng đến những cái này và không đề cập đến vấn đề appreciation. That work of art might be a painting, a sculpture, an installation of some kind or an example from the performing arts like dance or mime. I think we sometimes get bogged down by the notion of 'skill'. For many in the anti modern art camp, there needs to be evidence of the artist's craft on show before the work is taken seriously and can merit the term 'art', be it intricate drawing skills, expert use of form or an artist's eye for colour. I'm not suggesting that an artist need not have these credentials but hand in hand with craft is, as I said earlier, creative imagination, the ability to see the value or beauty of something unremarkable which would often go unnoticed by the untrained eye. [3] Untrained eye ~~ we (our), unnoticed ~ invisible ~ without any attention. [Câu này mình hiểu nhưng hơi khó giải thích á, bạn dịch 2 câu mình in nghiêng đó là hiểu sương sương nha. Much of modern art I think possesses this second quality which is why I often leave an exhibition of modern art feeling that I've had the chance to reflect on something that I wouldn't normally have given the time of day to. The art has engaged me, has had an impact, made me think about something in a way that I wouldn't have thought about before.

3 Certain aesthetic qualities can be invisible until brought to our attention by the artist.
5 Appreciation of the work itself is not always the artist's aim.



Michael
I would certainly call myself an art enthusiast and have been for many years and in my opinion the modern art world is full of second-rate junk which most of us, if we were being totally honest, would agree a 4-year-old child could do. The idea that a slept-in bed such as that 'produced' by Tracy Emin or many of the pieces by Damien Hirst and his ilk are works of art is hard to justify as is the huge price tag that accompanies their work. I find it particularly galling when extremely talented people out there who have spent years honing their skills and learning the craft of drawing or painting are completely ignored. [8] => Overpriced What's more, one of the dangers of this kind of 'art' is that it serves to alienate the mass of the population from the visual arts. The man in the street viewing one of these pieces is left thinking the world of modern art has no value; worse still, that he lacks the intellectual ability to understand the meaning of the piece when in fact there is little to interpret. Thankfully, one or two great artists make it through, but I'm afraid many are lost amongst the deluge of dross the art-world deems 'art'. For me, the first measure of the worth of an artist must be the degree of skill exhibited in the work (Mức độ kĩ năng được thể hiện) or at the very least a pedigree of fine art (Phả hệ mỹ thuật) preceding any more abstract pieces produced by the artist such as was the case with Picasso. [4] Hai cụm này tương đương với craftsmanship (sự lành nghề)

4 Picasso is an example of an artist who proved his craftsmanship.
8 Abstract art is generally overpriced.


Robert
The idea that modern art is some kind of mass deception and that all modern artists are talentless fraudsters just doesn't hold water. And I'm not talking here about the painters who for centuries ~ hundred of years [1] have to make a living out of copying works of art and selling them on as originals. I'm talking about abstract art and the idea that the great art collectors such as the Saatchis or Rockerfellas and the great museums of art around the world, would somehow allow themselves to be duped into paying a fortune for an abstract painting or sculpture. Are these artists really tricking these people into paying huge sums of money for something worthless? Of course not. Though some of these works may not appear to the layman as having any artistic merit, neither did the great impressionists or the more abstract works of Picasso or Rothko when they were first exhibited. [7] Dịch ra là hiểu nhé In the same way that great poetry can speak to us in a way that prose never can, abstract art can engage with the audience in more subtle and effective ways than is the case with art of a more realistic nature. So, they may get their fingers burnt now and again but I don't think the Saatchis will be cursing the day they spent huge sums on works of abstract art. Quite the opposite in fact and in the process of making a canny investment they have helped further raise the profile of some of our great modern artists.

1 Some practices have been going on for hundreds of years.
7 People don't always appreciate the works of great artists initially.
9 Abstract art isn't always a good investment. [Câu này mình không biết á, lúc nào cô chữa thì bạn cmt giúp mình với ha]


Janet
Here we go again: the media are once more up in arms about the latest 'is it art' shock-horror editorials following the latest Turner Prize shortlisting. When will they learn? For decades art in many forms has moved away from realism and towards abstraction. Ever since the invention and popularization of photography, art has had to reinvent itself. Patrons who wanted a perfect representation of themselves no longer needed to turn to the artist. Artists started to struggle with the challenge of catching the essence of the thing depicted rather than simply its external appearance. Abstract artists try to convey a pure idea, not the exact replica of the subject concerned. [6] Các nghệ sĩ bắt đầu phải vật lộn với thử thách nắm bắt được bản chất của sự vật được miêu tả thay vì chỉ đơn giản là hình dáng bên ngoài của nó. Các nghệ sĩ trừu tượng cố gắng truyền tải một ý tưởng thuần túy, không phải là bản sao chính xác của chủ đề liên quan. It's true that some works of art are so obscure that you may need to read up on the theory behind the creation, which is usually helpfully supplied in art galleries. But this isn't always necessary. Take Guernica by Picasso. To get a full understanding of this painting it could be argued the audience needs to appreciate the historical context, the bombing of the Basque city during the Spanish Civil War. It would also probably help to have a good understanding of the techniques of abstraction that Picasso had used to create the effect. [2] Chỗ này cũng dịch ra thôi á và suy luận thôi á, chỗ này hơi dễ bị lừa vì khúc sau. However, I think most people viewing this masterpiece would be struck by the horror it depicts even without this background knowledge [10] Hơi ngược chỗ trên một chút, nhưng mà nó là thế =))) . And I would argue it is the effect of this abstraction that adds to the impact on us compared to a realistic portrayal of such a scene.

2 Some people may not have the knowledge to understand a work of art fully.
6 The purpose of Art has undergone change.
10 We can be touched by a work of art without knowing the context.



Btw bạn thi HSG QG hay gì mà bài đọc tận CPE thế?

Đề này mình chỉ có đáp án, cô mình không chữa chi tiết, mình không hiểu đáp án nên mới lên diễn đàn hỏi .
Cô bảo làm nhiều sẽ tự hiểu ra

 

[ng.htrang2004]

Đề này mình chỉ có đáp án, cô mình không chữa chi tiết, mình không hiểu đáp án nên mới lên diễn đàn hỏi .
Cô bảo làm nhiều sẽ tự hiểu ra

=))) OK cô luôn. Mình thấy CAE đã khó rồi ấy, nhưng mà làm nhiều mà tự hiểu là không có đâu á, mình thấy thầy cô chữa cho trước khoảng 5 bài, chỉ cho một số cách để locate evidence thì sau này mình sẽ theo cái flow ấy mà làm, còn làm nhiều mà không hiểu, kiểu thiếu chất lượng ấy, thì khó nâng trình độ lắm luôn. Trên Youtube có một số video khá OK về dạng bài trong FCE và CAE, bạn có thể search để tham khảo thêm nhé.